Jim Hendrikx vs Parth Aggarwal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve: Jim Hendrikx has a slight advantage, winning 42.97% of second serve points compared to Parth Aggarwal's 39.81% over the last six months. Is this a potential indicator of match outcome? Yes, it often foretells match success.
• Return Game: Parth Aggarwal leads on first serve returns, winning 30.37% against Hendrikx's 27.08%. However, Hendrikx edges out Aggarwal on second serve returns, with 43.14% versus 42.55%. Which player might sustain rallies better? Hendrikx appears more effective in returning second serves.
• Under Pressure: Jim Hendrikx demonstrates superior resilience, saving 60.34% of breakpoints compared to Aggarwal's 47.89%. Could this influence critical game moments? It likely gives Hendrikx a decisive edge when under pressure.
• Match Wins: Over the last year, Hendrikx has balanced his record at 50%, while Aggarwal has a lower win rate of 43.59%. Might this reflect overall competitiveness in matches? Indeed, it suggests Hendrikx is more consistent.
• Best Surface: Parth Aggarwal excels on Clay with a 48% win rate, while Jim Hendrikx performs best on Hard at 48%. Which surface favors whom? Aggarwal for Clay, Hendrikx for Hard.
• Player Level: Both players mostly compete on Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, with Hendrikx holding a 50% win rate compared to Aggarwal's 44.74%. Does playing at similar levels equalize their match-up? It does, but Hendrikx has a slight performance edge.
• Opponent Quality: Hendrikx has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 181.22 compared to Aggarwal's 213. Does this indicate a tougher competition experience? Yes, it likely enhances Hendrikx's match readiness.
• Deciding Sets: Aggarwal has the advantage if the match reaches a deciding set, with a 54% win rate compared to Hendrikx’s 0%. Will this factor be pivotal if extended play occurs? Absolutely, it favors Aggarwal.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Hendrikx converts 50% of breakpoints and Aggarwal converts 49.25%. Does this marginal difference count in crucial breaks? It may, especially during tight games.

Editorial Prediction (November 26, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Parth Aggarwal and Jim Hendrikx presents an intriguing contest of comparable skills and styles. While Aggarwal shines with decisive sets and first serve returns, Hendrikx boasts superior second serve performance and resiliency under breakpoint pressure.

The competitive edge slightly leans in Hendrikx's favor due to his consistent win rate over the last year, the higher quality opponents faced, and a strong breakpoint-saving ability. These factors suggest that Hendrikx is better prepared to seize strategic opportunities during the match.

Overall, the slight statistical advantages seen in Hendrikx's recent performance mark him as the likely favorite in this upcoming encounter. Therefore, Jim Hendrikx is predicted to emerge victorious in this tennis match.